[GCC-XML] "members" and "context" consistent (and thus redundant?)

Brad King brad.king at kitware.com
Tue Apr 19 15:13:26 EDT 2005

John Morrison wrote:
> If I understand correctly, then, the set of "contexts" (back pointers,
> after a fashion, I guess) is complete.  If that's so, then I'm good to
> go!

That is correct.


More information about the gccxml mailing list