From beatricet at libero.it  Fri Jan  2 13:23:50 2015
From: beatricet at libero.it (Beatrice)
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 19:23:50 +0100
Subject: [GCC-XML] Help interpreting gccxml description in order to better
 translate its description
Message-ID: <20150102182350.GD1582@aebea.it.invalid>

Hi!

I am part of the Italian translation team of Debian. We work, among
other things on the translations of the package descriptions.

The description of libgccxml-dev package in Debian quotes part of your
webpage description of gccxml, particularly this sentence:

?There is one C++ parser, the C++ front-end to GCC, which is currently
able to deal with the language in its entirety. The purpose of the
GCC-XML extension is to generate an XML description of a C++ program
from GCC's internal representation.?

We are trying to find an agreement on how to translate this. Can you
please tell me if, when you
say "There is one..." you mean :

 a) There is "1" (as in there is "only 1")

or

 b) There is a C++ parser....

Thanks,

beatrice

From pjb at informatimago.com  Sat Jan  3 00:19:22 2015
From: pjb at informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 06:19:22 +0100
Subject: [GCC-XML] Help interpreting gccxml description in order to
	better translate its description
In-Reply-To: <20150102182350.GD1582@aebea.it.invalid>
References: <20150102182350.GD1582@aebea.it.invalid>
Message-ID: <8F7D3293-412C-473A-8C25-C07F98FADE7F@informatimago.com>


> On 02 Jan 2015, at 19:23, Beatrice <beatricet at libero.it> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I am part of the Italian translation team of Debian. We work, among
> other things on the translations of the package descriptions.
> 
> The description of libgccxml-dev package in Debian quotes part of your
> webpage description of gccxml, particularly this sentence:
> 
> ?There is one C++ parser, the C++ front-end to GCC, which is currently
> able to deal with the language in its entirety. The purpose of the
> GCC-XML extension is to generate an XML description of a C++ program
> from GCC's internal representation.?
> 
> We are trying to find an agreement on how to translate this. Can you
> please tell me if, when you
> say "There is one..." you mean :
> 
> a) There is "1" (as in there is "only 1")
> 
> or
> 
> b) There is a C++ parser....
> 
> Thanks,



On don't think we can assign full mathematical veracity to such a statement.  
Therefore you should probably translate from "There is a C++ parser."

(I have doubt that the number of C++ parser able to deal really with the language in its entirety is even 1 (because I've been told, C++ is not context-free, so you need information from the back end to be able to "parse" "correctly" C++) ; and if you consider that the C++ front-end ot GCC is able to do that, then nowadays, there are probably more than 1 parsers that are able to do the same).

-- 
__Pascal J. Bourguignon__



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/gccxml/attachments/20150103/8a8a42a5/attachment.html>

From beatricet at libero.it  Sat Jan  3 08:04:58 2015
From: beatricet at libero.it (beatrice)
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 14:04:58 +0100
Subject: [GCC-XML] Help interpreting gccxml description in order to
 better translate its description
In-Reply-To: <8F7D3293-412C-473A-8C25-C07F98FADE7F@informatimago.com>
References: <20150102182350.GD1582@aebea.it.invalid>
 <8F7D3293-412C-473A-8C25-C07F98FADE7F@informatimago.com>
Message-ID: <20150103130458.GA1761@aebea.it.invalid>

On Saturday 03 January 2015, at 06:19 +0100, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:

> > a) There is "1" (as in there is "only 1")
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > b) There is a C++ parser....
> > 
> > Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> On don't think we can assign full mathematical veracity to such a statement.  
> Therefore you should probably translate from "There is a C++ parser."

We are gonna do that,

thanks!

beatrice

From albrecht.liebscher.ext at siemens.com  Thu Jan 22 06:51:05 2015
From: albrecht.liebscher.ext at siemens.com (Liebscher, Albrecht (ext))
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:51:05 +0000
Subject: [GCC-XML] Win32.Zip Download Version
Message-ID: <6D830200366AF94CA4ABFA6FE3023195059A24@DENBGAT9EL5MSX.ww902.siemens.net>

Hello,

first of all thank you for your effort to provide a tool like gccxml. It's exactly what I was looking for to avoid the hard way implementing a C code parser.
I tried the win32 zip download, but now a got the following problems:

>gccxml.exe myfile.c -fxml=output.xml
Compiler "cl" is not supported by GCC_XML because neither MSVC 6 or MSVC 7 is installed.
Could not determine GCCXML_FLAGS setting.

Do I need to install VS6 or VS7 to work with this precompiled version?
Is there a precompiled binary available working with VS2013?

Best regards,
Albrecht

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/gccxml/attachments/20150122/6ae6d20a/attachment-0001.html>

From brad.king at kitware.com  Thu Jan 22 08:37:19 2015
From: brad.king at kitware.com (Brad King)
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:37:19 -0500
Subject: [GCC-XML] Win32.Zip Download Version
In-Reply-To: <6D830200366AF94CA4ABFA6FE3023195059A24@DENBGAT9EL5MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
References: <6D830200366AF94CA4ABFA6FE3023195059A24@DENBGAT9EL5MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
Message-ID: <54C0FD0F.5070600@kitware.com>

On 01/22/2015 06:51 AM, Liebscher, Albrecht (ext) wrote:
> Is there a precompiled binary available working with VS2013?

No, sorry.  We haven't provided precompiled binaries in a long time.

-Brad