[GCC-XML] last commit

Brad King brad.king at kitware.com
Thu Jun 12 15:02:52 EDT 2008

Brad King wrote:
> Roman Yakovenko wrote:
>> if you ask me, I would revert last commit. The
>> previous situation was deterministic: only declarations, defined by
>> the users, were dumped. Now, I cannot even reliably apply my
>> "guesses".
> In that case how do you propose to fix this bug:
>   http://www.gccxml.org/Bug/view.php?id=7148
> ?  This is a case where your old guesses would be wrong, I think.

Can you work with the current version if you ignore declarations marked
"artificial"?  Remember that before the GCC 4.2 upgrade the artificial
copy constructor *did* show up.


More information about the gccxml mailing list