[GCC-XML] last commit

Roman Yakovenko roman.yakovenko at gmail.com
Thu Jun 12 15:11:08 EDT 2008

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
> Brad King wrote:
>> Roman Yakovenko wrote:
>>> if you ask me, I would revert last commit. The
>>> previous situation was deterministic: only declarations, defined by
>>> the users, were dumped. Now, I cannot even reliably apply my
>>> "guesses".
>> In that case how do you propose to fix this bug:
>>   http://www.gccxml.org/Bug/view.php?id=7148
>> ?  This is a case where your old guesses would be wrong, I think.

Yes. In this case pygccxml will not be able to guess. It is trade-off.

> Can you work with the current version if you ignore declarations marked
> "artificial"?  Remember that before the GCC 4.2 upgrade the artificial
> copy constructor *did* show up.

Good idea! I didn't think about it. I can do this. I can take
"artificial" declarations into account if they exist and apply the
current logic if they don't.

Thank you!

Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding

More information about the gccxml mailing list